Privacy is a hot topic for users of Facebook, Google, and other Social Media sites, so the White House has proposed the following Bill of Rights for legislative consideration:
1. INDIVIDUAL CONTROL: Consumers have a right to exercise control over what personal
data companies collect from them and how they…
Path confessed that it took users’ address book data without permission when the app loaded and admits it “made a mistake.” Path’s app runs on the iPhone and Android and according to Path’s Story:
Path dreamed up and realized the Smart Journal–a journal that’s with you everywhere you go…
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) refused to order a Social Media site to prevent the unlawful use of copyrighted works. In 2010 SABAM (Société Belge des Auteurs, Compositeurs et Editeurs), the Belgian collecting society for music royalties, lost a lawsuit to force Netlog (a Social…
The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) filed a Motion to enjoin Google from implementing new ToS and Privacy Policies on March 1, 2012. On February 8, 2012 EPIC filed a Motion for Temporary relief against the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to enforce Google’s March 2011 Agreement Containing Consent Order which…
Continue Reading Motion Filed to Stop Google’s New Terms of Service (ToS) and Privacy Policies
Privacy continues to be hot news, just look at Facebook’s S-1 disclosures in its Initial Public Offering (IPO) which among a myriad of “Risk Factors” includes this statement about privacy laws:
Our business is subject to complex and evolving U.S. and foreign laws and regulations regarding privacy, data protection, and…
EU officials announced that the new Google Privacy Policies may not insure compliance with EU laws and asked Google to halt these changes pending an investigation of the implications of personal data protection. Google’s new Privacy Policies are scheduled to go into effect on March 1, 2012 and the New York…
Continue Reading EU to Google – Not so Fast with the new Privacy Policies!
GPS data about an alleged drug dealer’s location obtained from a GPS device attached to his car without a warrant, violated the defendant’s Fourth Amendment guarantee of privacy. In US v. Jones the US Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that prosecutors could not use the ill-gotten GPS data. However the Court…
Continue Reading Supreme Court Rules 9-0 to Protect GPS Data
